|
The Results
(of RMA)
| The results are in the form of a top-down
analysis and comparison of the failure modes, effects
and criticalities of the candidate systems, with recommendations
for improved reliability. |
| The analysis results are suitable for use
- |
 |
by an equipment manufacturer as a marketing tool and
as an engineering management too |
 |
by an operator, for incorporation into a Well Feasibility
Study, to assist in the overall evaluation of the field
development options |
The calculated risk values for all the elements of each of
the options are examined in detail from various points of
view, to provide the required comparisons, and to highlight
the critical aspects driving the risk in each option.
The results indicate which potential failures dominate the
risks in the different options, and which are in the next
lower level of contribution. From those results, we are able
to provide recommendations on the best mitigating measures
to reduce the risks in the different options, and provide
comparisons of the “before-and-after” risk profiles
of the options.
We are also able to compare the breakdown of risks into different
cost categories, such as intervention costs, deferment costs
and loss of reserves.
The conclusions of the analysis present the reliability risks,
from all phases of the project, in a quantitative way that
enables an operator to compare them in financial terms directly
with development costs and predicted returns.
More about RMA...
Overview / The Technique
/ The Benefits
|